Home/Legal Guides/ABH & GBH Pre-Charge Investigations

ABH • GBH • injury • intent • before charge

ABH & GBH Pre-Charge Investigations

Before charge in an ABH or GBH investigation, the exact injury and the evidence of intention, recklessness, causation, identification and lawful self-defence can affect which offence is realistically in issue. We build the incident chronology, preserve CCTV and witness evidence, review medical and digital material and assess what should be put before the charging decision.

Reviewed by
Paris Theodorou
· Principal Solicitor · Last reviewed
November 4, 2026

KEY ANSWER

The position in brief

ABH and GBH are not interchangeable labels for the same assault. Under the current CPS charging guidance, section 47 ABH requires an intentional or reckless assault causing actual bodily harm that is more than transient or trifling. Section 20 concerns unlawful wounding or inflicting grievous bodily harm, with GBH meaning really serious harm. Section 18 is more serious again because it requires the relevant intent to cause GBH or wounding.

The defence should therefore separate the level of injury from the mental element. A serious injury does not by itself answer what the suspect intended, while the allegation may also raise identification, self-defence or causation issues.

Legal issues

Section 47 of the Offences against the Person Act 1861 concerns assault occasioning actual bodily harm. The CPS guidance states that harm need not be permanent but must be more than transient and trifling.

For section 20, GBH means really serious harm and a wound requires a break in the continuity of the skin. The required mental element is different from section 18: for section 20 the suspect must intend or foresee that the act might cause some harm, whereas section 18 requires the relevant intent to cause GBH or wounding.

Charge selection is fact-specific. Injury, weapon use, duration and nature of the incident, prior threats or planning, admissions and the circumstances of the alleged assault can all be relevant. Where self-defence or another lawful justification is raised, the evidence supporting that account needs to be identified early.

Evidence that matters

Relevant evidence can include CCTV, doorbell footage, police body-worn video, 999 calls, photographs, medical records, witness statements, location evidence, messages before or after the incident, forensic evidence and records showing the sequence of events.

Medical evidence should be matched to the alleged mechanism and timing of injury rather than treated as a substitute for evidence about who caused it or with what intent. CCTV and body-worn footage may also show events before and after the moment of physical contact.

Reasonable lines of enquiry

Focused enquiries can include preservation and recovery of CCTV, body-worn video and 999 material; identification of independent witnesses; complete medical records where necessary; photographs; location or phone material; and evidence bearing on self-defence, identification, causation or intent.

Where several people were involved, the role of each suspect should be distinguished. A group incident should not be reduced to a single undifferentiated account if the available footage, witnesses or forensic material can identify who did what.

What happens next

The defence should establish the interview position, bail or RUI status, the injury relied on, whether medical evidence is complete, whether CCTV or body-worn footage has been obtained and whether further witnesses or forensic work are outstanding.

The CPS charging guidance, updated February 2026, requires prosecutors first to assess the level of injury and then step back and select the charge that properly reflects all the circumstances. The distinction between section 18 and section 20 requires direct attention to the evidence of intention or recklessness.

Where material evidence has not yet been obtained or the existing account materially overstates the role, injury, intent or context, focused reasonable enquiries or pre-charge representations may be appropriate before charge.

Immediate steps

Preserve photographs, messages and location material. Identify CCTV or doorbell cameras immediately because footage can be overwritten. Record independent witnesses and obtain the police reference, officer details, interview status and any bail conditions.

Do not contact a complainant or witness where prohibited or where doing so could create a new evidential issue. If self-defence is relied on, identify the evidence supporting the perceived threat, sequence of events and force used rather than reducing the account to a label.

What should you send us?

Send the allegation; police force and officer; interview date and outcome; bail or RUI status; next known date; injury description; photographs or medical material; CCTV, doorbell or body-worn-video details; witness information; relevant messages; and a short chronology of what happened before, during and after the alleged assault.

Legal information from Theodorous. The law and procedure can change and the application of the law depends on the facts. This guide is general information, not advice on your individual case.

HOW WE CAN HELP

What Theodorous can do

We can analyse the likely offence level, injury evidence, identification, intent and self-defence issues; review CCTV, body-worn video, messages and medical material; identify missing reasonable lines of enquiry; advise on further interview and bail; and prepare focused pre-charge representations where justified.

Primary legal sources

CPS Offences against the Person, incorporating the Charging Standard — updated February 2026; sections 47, 20 and 18, injury thresholds, mental elements and charge selection.

Offences against the Person Act 1861 — statutory offences including sections 18, 20 and 47.

The Code for Crown Prosecutors — evidential and public-interest tests and charge selection principles.

PACE Code C 2023 — interview and legal-advice safeguards.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Questions before your next step

What is the difference between ABH and GBH?

ABH under section 47 requires actual bodily harm that is more than transient or trifling. GBH means really serious harm. The correct charge also depends on the required mental element and all the circumstances, not injury description alone.

What is the difference between section 18 and section 20 GBH?

The critical distinction is the mental element. CPS guidance states that section 20 requires intention or foresight of some harm, whereas section 18 requires the relevant intent to cause GBH or wounding. Evidence such as weapon use, severity, duration, planning, threats and admissions may be relevant to intent.

Can self-defence be raised before an ABH or GBH charge?

Yes, where the evidence supports it. The defence account should identify the perceived threat, sequence of events and force used, together with CCTV, witnesses, injuries or other material capable of testing the prosecution account.

NEXT STEP

Discuss an ABH or GBH investigation before charge

Send the allegation, injury details, police status and any CCTV, witness or medical evidence so the likely charge and defence issues can be assessed.

Discuss an ABH or GBH investigation before charge