Home/Legal Guides/Legal Guide

Seized phones • digital evidence • search and retention

Police Device Seizure & Digital Evidence

A seized phone, laptop or storage device can become central to a criminal investigation and can also disrupt work, business and access to essential records. We identify the legal basis for the search and seizure, what was taken, how digital material is being examined, what evidence is actually relevant and whether return, access, copies or focused defence enquiries should be pursued.

KEY ANSWER

The position in brief

Police can seize digital devices and other property where a lawful search or seizure power applies, but seizure is not the same as unlimited retention or unrestricted examination. PACE Code B governs police entry, search, seizure and retention and requires the exercise of those powers to be justified and proportionate.

Digital investigations can involve very large volumes of material. The current CPS digital-material guidance emphasises an investigation strategy and reasonable lines of enquiry rather than treating every item on a device as automatically relevant. The defence should identify the legal power used, the scope of the search, the material said to matter and any practical need for return or access.

Legal issues

The first issue is the legal basis on which the device was obtained. It may have been seized under a warrant, during a lawful search or arrest, or under another statutory power. PACE Code B requires officers to act within the scope of the relevant power and contains specific rules on seizure and retention.

Under Code B, property may be seized where it is covered by the warrant or there are reasonable grounds to believe it is evidence and seizure is necessary to prevent concealment, loss, alteration, destruction or tampering. Part 2 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 also provides limited seize-and-sift powers where it is not reasonably practicable on the premises to determine what may lawfully be seized.

Material subject to legal professional privilege requires particular protection. The existence of a phone or computer does not remove privilege merely because privileged and non-privileged material are stored together.

Evidence that matters

Digital evidence can include messages, call records, photographs, videos, notes, browser activity, application data, cloud-linked material, documents, location information and metadata. The important questions include who used the device or account, when material was created or received, whether a message is complete, and what issue the material can properly prove.

Context matters. A screenshot, extracted message or keyword hit can be misleading if the surrounding conversation, date range, account ownership or device attribution is not understood. Where investigators create an extraction or report, the defence may need to identify what material was included, excluded or searched.

Reasonable lines of enquiry

Focused enquiries may include device and account attribution, complete message threads, relevant date ranges, deleted or recovered material where lawfully available, metadata, location evidence, other devices or accounts, cloud records, and evidence capable of testing the prosecution interpretation of digital communications.

The CPS Disclosure Manual states that investigators and prosecutors should consider the digital strategy early and that reasonable lines of enquiry and proportionality remain central even where the available dataset is very large.

What happens next

After seizure, police may image or examine the device, use material in interview, continue enquiries or retain the item for forensic examination or proceedings. PACE Code B provides that seized property should be retained only for as long as necessary for permitted purposes and that an original should not be retained for specified investigative purposes if a copy or image would be sufficient.

Where seize-and-sift powers under sections 50 or 51 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 are used, Code B provides additional procedures, including written notice and mechanisms concerning examination and return. Code B also recognises rights to request a list or description of retained property and, subject to investigative prejudice and other limits, supervised access or copies.

The correct route for seeking return or access depends on the power used, the investigation and the material involved. It should be assessed from the warrant, notice, seizure record and current investigation status rather than assumed from the passage of time alone.

Immediate steps

Keep the warrant, search notice, seizure schedule, property receipt and all police correspondence. Record exactly which devices were taken, from where, who used each device and whether any item contains legally privileged, confidential business or essential personal material.

Do not remotely wipe, alter or interfere with a seized or linked device or account. Preserve passwords, ownership records and information needed to distinguish accounts or users, but obtain specific advice before responding to any formal demand for access credentials or protected information.

What should you send us?

Send the police force and officer; suspected offence; date and place of seizure; warrant, search notice and property receipt; list of devices taken; who owned or used each device; interview, bail or RUI status; any police correspondence about examination or retention; any request concerning passwords or access; and the practical reason return or access is urgent.

Legal information from Theodorous. The law and procedure can change and the application of the law depends on the facts. This guide is general information, not advice on your individual case.

HOW WE CAN HELP

What Theodorous can do

We can review the search and seizure paperwork, identify the statutory power being relied on, assess the scope and retention position, analyse the role of digital material in the suspected offence, identify relevant defence enquiries and correspond about access, copies or return where there is a proper basis.

We can also coordinate the device issue with interview strategy and pre-charge representations so that digital evidence is addressed as part of the criminal investigation rather than as a separate technical problem.

Primary legal sources

PACE Code B 2023 — police powers of entry, search, seizure, retention, access and property safeguards.

CPS Disclosure Manual, Chapter 30: Digital Material — updated June 2026; digital strategy, reasonable lines of enquiry and communications evidence.

Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, Part 2 — additional seizure, examination and return procedures.

PACE Code C 2023 — interview safeguards where seized digital material is used in questioning.

NEXT STEP

Discuss a seized phone or digital evidence issue

Send the search and seizure paperwork, devices taken, investigation status and any urgent access or return issue so the legal position can be assessed.

Discuss a seized phone or digital evidence issue

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Questions about this issue

Can police keep my phone for a criminal investigation?

They can retain lawfully seized property for permitted investigative or evidential purposes while retention remains necessary. PACE Code B also states that, for specified purposes, an original should not be retained where a copy or image would be sufficient. The answer therefore depends on the seizure power, examination required and current investigation.

Can I ask for access to or a copy of material on a seized device?

Potentially. Code B contains rights concerning lists or descriptions of retained property and, subject to limits including investigative prejudice, supervised access or copies. Whether access can safely and lawfully be arranged in a particular case depends on the material and the investigation.

Can police examine everything on a seized phone?

A lawful seizure does not mean that every item of digital material is automatically relevant to the investigation. The scope of the legal power, the warrant or search basis, reasonable lines of enquiry, proportionality and protections such as legal professional privilege all matter when digital material is examined.