Home/Legal Guides/Legal Guide

JOINT ENTERPRISE • ASSISTANCE • ENCOURAGEMENT • INTENT

Joint Enterprise & Secondary Liability Defence

In a multi-defendant case, criminal responsibility must be proved against each person individually. “Joint enterprise” is commonly used to describe secondary liability, where someone who did not personally commit the substantive offence is alleged to have intentionally assisted or encouraged it.

KEY ANSWER

The position in brief

Joint enterprise is not a separate criminal offence. Secondary liability applies where a person intentionally assists or encourages another person to commit an offence with the mental element required by law.

After R v Jogee, foresight that another person might commit an offence is evidence from which intent may be inferred, but foresight is not itself the legal test. The prosecution must prove intentional assistance or encouragement and the required state of mind.

Legal issues

The prosecution should distinguish principal liability from secondary liability and identify what act is said to amount to assistance or encouragement. Presence, association or knowledge of another person’s offending is not automatically enough.

The required mental element depends on the substantive offence and the alleged assistance or encouragement. Cases involving escalating violence can require particularly careful analysis of what the secondary party intended, what offence was ultimately committed and what evidence supports the prosecution inference.

Secondary liability is distinct from conspiracy. Conspiracy concerns an agreement to pursue criminal conduct; secondary liability concerns responsibility for another person’s substantive offence because of intentional assistance or encouragement.

Evidence that matters

Evidence can include CCTV, body-worn video, messages, calls, location data, vehicles, weapons, financial records, witness accounts and conduct before, during and after the offence. In group cases, the evidence should be separated defendant by defendant.

Reasonable lines of enquiry

Reasonable enquiries may include full communications rather than selected extracts, CCTV showing each person’s conduct, location and timing, evidence of withdrawal or non-participation, innocent explanations for association and material bearing on whether assistance or encouragement was intentional.

What happens next

Secondary-liability allegations commonly arise in homicide, serious violence, robbery, burglary, drugs and other multi-defendant Crown Court cases. The prosecution should specify the factual and legal basis on which each defendant is alleged to be liable.

Early defence work should identify whether the case alleges principal participation, secondary liability, conspiracy or more than one route because the evidential and legal questions are different.

Immediate steps

Preserve complete communications, location evidence and material explaining your relationship with the other defendants. Do not coordinate accounts with co-accused or contact witnesses contrary to bail conditions or legal advice.

What should you send us?

Send the charge or suspected offence, prosecution case summary, your alleged role, co-defendant details, messages or call schedules, CCTV/location evidence, interview material, bail conditions and next date.

Legal information from Theodorous. The law and procedure can change and the application of the law depends on the facts. This guide is general information, not advice on your individual case.

HOW WE CAN HELP

What Theodorous can do

We can isolate the case against you from the group evidence, analyse the alleged assistance or encouragement and intent, review communications and CCTV, advise at interview and prepare Crown Court defence in complex multi-defendant proceedings.

Primary legal sources

CPS: Secondary Liability — charging decisions on principals and accessories.

CPS Joint Enterprise National Monitoring Scheme 2025–26 — current monitoring context and explanation of principal and secondary participation.

NEXT STEP

Discuss a joint-enterprise allegation

Send the substantive offence, your alleged role and the communications, CCTV or location evidence so your individual liability can be separated from the group case.

Discuss a joint-enterprise allegation

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Questions about this issue

Is being present at the scene enough for joint enterprise?

No. Presence can form part of the evidence, but secondary liability requires proof of the legal basis of participation, including intentional assistance or encouragement and the required mental element.

Is foresight enough to convict after Jogee?

No. Foresight that another offence might be committed may be evidence from which intent is inferred, but it is not itself the legal test for secondary liability.

What is the difference between joint enterprise and conspiracy?

Conspiracy concerns an agreement to pursue criminal conduct. Secondary liability concerns intentionally assisting or encouraging another person’s substantive offence. A prosecution may raise both, but they are legally distinct.