Home/Legal Guides/Legal Guide

MESSAGES • SOCIAL MEDIA • THREATS • ATTRIBUTION

Malicious Communications & Online Offences

Online communications can engage several different criminal offences. The legal analysis depends on the exact words or image, whether a threat was credible, who sent it, the intended effect, the surrounding context and whether the conduct is better characterised as harassment, stalking, an intimate-image offence or another crime.

KEY ANSWER

The position in brief

There is no single offence covering every offensive or abusive online message. Current CPS guidance requires prosecutors to identify the conduct first: credible threats, targeted harassment or stalking, false or threatening communications, intimate-image abuse, blackmail and other offences have different statutory tests.

For the defence, complete context and attribution are often as important as the wording itself. A cropped screenshot may not show who controlled an account, what preceded the message or whether the communication was part of a wider exchange.

Legal issues

The relevant offence may arise under the Online Safety Act 2023 communications provisions, the Malicious Communications Act 1988 for conduct still within its scope, harassment or stalking legislation, the Sexual Offences Act 2003, blackmail or another statute.

Freedom of expression is relevant context but does not protect credible threats or criminal conduct. Charge selection must match the statutory elements actually provable.

Evidence that matters

Evidence commonly includes complete message threads, account and device attribution, IP or subscriber data, screenshots, exports, voice notes, platform records, call logs, location data and evidence of the parties’ relationship and prior communications.

Reasonable lines of enquiry

Enquiries may include obtaining native platform exports, checking whether screenshots are complete or altered, identifying account/device users, recovering deleted context where lawful and relevant, and distinguishing one-off communications from a course of conduct.

What happens next

Cases may begin with voluntary interview or arrest followed by device examination and platform enquiries. Depending on the offence, proceedings may remain in the Magistrates’ Court or proceed to the Crown Court.

Immediate steps

Preserve the complete communication history and account data. Do not delete posts or messages after becoming aware of an investigation. Do not contact the complainant contrary to bail or no-contact conditions.

What should you send us?

Send the exact message/post or full thread, screenshots and exports, police papers, platform/account details, chronology, bail conditions and next date.

Legal information from Theodorous. The law and procedure can change and the application of the law depends on the facts. This guide is general information, not advice on your individual case.

HOW WE CAN HELP

What Theodorous can do

We can identify the correct offence, analyse attribution and context, review digital evidence, advise at interview, address overlap with stalking/harassment or intimate-image offences and prepare pre-charge representations where justified.

NEXT STEP

Discuss an online communications allegation

Send the full communication, platform details and police status so the correct offence and digital-evidence issues can be identified.

Discuss an online communications allegation

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

Questions about this issue

Is sending an offensive message automatically a criminal offence?

No. The precise statutory offence and its elements must be satisfied. Context, intent, content and the nature of the communication matter.

Can a screenshot be challenged?

Yes. Completeness, authenticity, metadata, account attribution and surrounding messages may all be relevant.

Can online messages also amount to stalking or harassment?

Potentially. Repeated communications can form part of a course of conduct, but the separate statutory elements still need to be proved.