What can pre-charge defence do in a sexual offence investigation?
Sexual offence investigations can turn on closely contested issues of fact, identification, consent or reasonable belief in consent where legally relevant, age or capacity in some offences, and what the surrounding communications and conduct show. The defence should identify the actual issue in the case rather than rely on general assertions or stereotypes.
Pre-charge work can place relevant defence material before the investigator or prosecutor while the case is still being assessed. It can also identify reasonable, proportionate lines of enquiry that point towards or away from the suspect, including relevant digital communications, CCTV, location material or independent witnesses.
When early intervention may matter
Early intervention may be useful where contemporaneous messages provide important context, CCTV or location evidence may be lost with time, an independent witness has not been approached, the interview account identifies a specific enquiry, digital material has been misunderstood, or the allegation depends on a factual proposition that can be tested against objective evidence.
Representations should usually be made when the defence understands enough of the allegation to make targeted submissions and while the decision-maker can still act on them. Sending an unfocused letter too early can be ineffective; waiting until after charge can remove the opportunity altogether.
How we analyse a sexual offence investigation before charge
We start with the precise alleged offence, the complainant's account as disclosed, the client's interview and the known chronology. We then map communications, meetings, travel or location evidence, CCTV, witnesses, medical or forensic material where relevant, and any device or third-party evidence that may bear on a genuine issue in the case.
The strategy is evidence-led. Any request for further material must have a proper foundation and be proportionate; private or third-party material should not be sought speculatively. Where the client's account identifies a reasonable line of enquiry, we can explain why it matters to the charging assessment and what should be preserved or obtained.
What can pre-charge representations ask the decision-maker to consider?
Where the evidence supports it, representations may invite no further action, identify why a proposed charge is not supported, or ask for specified enquiries to be completed before a final decision. They cannot guarantee an outcome. In serious sexual allegations the central task is to ensure the charging decision is made on a fair, complete and properly analysed evidential picture.
What should you send us for the first review?
Sexual offence investigation FAQs
What are reasonable lines of enquiry in a sexual offence investigation?
They are enquiries that are reasonable in the context of the particular allegation and may point towards or away from the suspect. Depending on the issues, they can include specific communications, CCTV, location evidence, witnesses, digital material or properly founded third-party material. Speculative trawling is not the test.
Does the police have to examine every message or third-party record?
No. Current disclosure guidance requires a proportionate, issue-led approach. Large digital datasets can be searched using appropriate methods rather than every item being read individually, and private or third-party material should only be pursued where there is a proper evidential foundation.
What is a Disclosure Management Document in a RASSO case?
Current CPS guidance requires a Disclosure Management Document in rape and serious sexual offence cases. It records the prosecution approach to disclosure and reasonable lines of enquiry so that the strategy is transparent and can be kept under review. Further work required before charge can also be identified through a pre-charge action plan.
Can pre-charge representations address consent or reasonable belief in consent?
Where those issues are legally relevant to the alleged offence, yes. Any representation should be tied to the actual evidence, chronology, communications and objective material rather than stereotypes or general assertions.
Can pre-charge representations guarantee no further action?
No. They can identify evidential weaknesses, missing enquiries, legal issues or objective defence material that should be considered before the police or CPS makes a final charging decision, but the outcome remains with the investigator or prosecutor.
Prepared by Theodorous. Principal Solicitor: Paris Theodorou.